Opinions from 2019

  • Kisor v. Wilkie0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Kisor, a Vietnam veteran, unsuccessfully sought VA disability benefits in 1982, alleging that he had developed PTSD from his military service. In 2006, Kisor moved to reopen his claim. The VA then agreed he was eligible for benefits, but granted benefits only from the date of his motion to reopen,

    READ MORE

  • United States v. Haymond0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Haymond was convicted of possessing child pornography, which carries a prison term of zero to 10 years. After serving 38 months, while on supervised release, Haymond was found with what appeared to be child pornography. The government sought to revoke his supervised release and secure an additional prison sentence. A

    READ MORE

  • Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Tennessee law requires applicants for an initial license to operate a retail liquor store to have resided in Tennessee for the prior two years; an applicant for license renewal must have resided in Tennessee for 10 consecutive years. A corporation cannot obtain a license unless all of its stockholders are

    READ MORE

  • Dutra Group v. Batterton0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Batterton was working on a Dutra vessel when a hatch blew open and injured his hand. Batterton sued Dutra, asserting various claims, including unseaworthiness, and seeking general and punitive damages. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of Dutra’s motion to dismiss the claim for punitive damages: The Supreme Court reversed.

    READ MORE

  • Iancu v. Brunetti0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Brunetti sought federal registration of the trademark FUCT. The Patent and Trademark Office denied his application under a Lanham Act provision that prohibits registration of trademarks that consist of or comprise “immoral[ ] or scandalous matter,” 15 U.S.C. 1052(a). The Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit in holding that the

    READ MORE

  • 0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Defendants were convicted of Hobbs Act robbery and conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery and under 18 U.S.C. 924(c), which authorizes heightened penalties for using, carrying, or possessing a firearm in connection with any federal “crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.” “Crime of violence” is defined in an elements

    READ MORE

Latest Posts

About Oregon Press News

There are always cases that the Supreme Court of the United States hears. These cases are designed to decide important legal issues. The cases are decided by the Supreme Court through a review of the arguments made in the case. The court is a form of government, in that it is responsible for the administration, interpretation, and enforcement of the law.

Recent Decisions

Latest Galleries

Top
© Copyright Oregonpressnews.