Case Documents

  • City of Tahlequah v. Bond0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Rollice’s ex-wife called 911. Rollice was in her garage, intoxicated, and would not leave. Three officers responded to the call and spoke with Rollice through the garage’s doorway. Rollice began fidgeting with something in his hands; he appeared nervous. Rollice refused a request for a pat-down. Police body-camera video captured

    READ MORE

  • Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Union City, California officer Rivas-Villegas responded to a 911 call reporting that a woman and her children were barricaded in a room for fear that Cortesluna, the woman’s boyfriend, was going to hurt them. After confirming that the family had no means of escape, Rivas-Villegas and other officers commanded Cortesluna

    READ MORE

  • Dunn v. Reeves0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations In 1996, Reeves and some friends went “looking for some robberies ” but their car broke down. Johnson offered to tow their vehicle. After they arrived, Reeves shot Johnson and directed the others to get his money. Reeves bragged that the murder would earn him a gang tattoo; at a

    READ MORE

  • Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Arizona voters may cast their ballots on election day in person at a traditional precinct or a “voting center” in their county of residence, may cast an “early ballot” by mail, or may vote in person at an early voting location in each county. Arizonans who vote in person on

    READ MORE

  • PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Under the Natural Gas Act, to build an interstate pipeline, a natural gas company must obtain from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) a certificate of “public convenience and necessity,” 15 U.S.C. 717f(e). A 1947 amendment, section 717f(h), authorized certificate holders to exercise the federal eminent domain power. FERC granted

    READ MORE

  • Johnson v. Guzman-Chavez0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reinstated the prior removal orders of aliens who were removed from the U.S. and reentered without authorization. Each alien sought to prevent DHS’s execution of those orders based on fear of returning to their home country. While their withholding-only proceedings were pending, DHS detained

    READ MORE

Latest Posts

About Oregon Press News

There are always cases that the Supreme Court of the United States hears. These cases are designed to decide important legal issues. The cases are decided by the Supreme Court through a review of the arguments made in the case. The court is a form of government, in that it is responsible for the administration, interpretation, and enforcement of the law.

Recent Decisions

Latest Galleries

Top
© Copyright Oregonpressnews.