Case Documents

  • Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Two teachers at Roman Catholic elementary schools were employed under agreements that set out the schools’ mission to develop and promote a Catholic School faith community; imposed commitments regarding religious instruction, worship, and personal modeling of the faith; and explained that teachers’ performance would be reviewed on those bases. Each

    READ MORE

  • Peter v. NantKwest, Inc.0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations The Patent Act provides two methods for challenging an adverse decision by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO): direct appeal to the Federal Circuit, 35 U.S.C. 141, or a new civil action against the PTO Director in the Eastern District of Virginia, section 145. Under section 145, the applicant must

    READ MORE

  • Rotkiske v. Klemm 0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) authorizes private civil actions against debt collectors “within one year from the date on which the violation occurs,” 15 U.S.C. 1692k(d). Klemm sued Rotkiske to collect an unpaid debt and attempted service at an address where Rotkiske no longer lived. An individual other

    READ MORE

  • Thompson v. Hebdon0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Alaska law limits the amount an individual can contribute to a candidate for political office, or to an election-oriented group other than a political party, to $500 per year. Alaska Stat. 15.13.070(b)(1). Plaintiffs contributed the maximum amounts permitted but wanted to contribute more. They challenged the limits under the First

    READ MORE

  • Mitchell v. Wisconsin0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations Mitchell was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated after a preliminary breath test registered a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) triple Wisconsin’s legal limit for driving. Taken to a police station for a more reliable breath test using evidence-grade equipment, Mitchell was too lethargic for a breath test. Taken to

    READ MORE

  • Rucho v. Common Cause0

    Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations North Carolina plaintiffs claimed that the state’s congressional districting plan discriminated against Democrats. Maryland plaintiffs claimed that their state’s plan discriminated against Republicans. The plaintiffs cited the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause, the Elections Clause, and Article I, section 2. The district courts ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.

    READ MORE

Latest Posts

About Oregon Press News

There are always cases that the Supreme Court of the United States hears. These cases are designed to decide important legal issues. The cases are decided by the Supreme Court through a review of the arguments made in the case. The court is a form of government, in that it is responsible for the administration, interpretation, and enforcement of the law.

Recent Decisions

Latest Galleries

Top
© Copyright Oregonpressnews.